Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Brain Behav ; : e2787, 2022 Nov 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2121574

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Little is known about risk factors for mortality in older patients with COVID-19 and neuropsychiatric conditions. METHODS: We conducted a multicentric retrospective observational study at Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris. We selected inpatients aged 70 years or older, with COVID-19 and preexisting neuropsychiatric comorbidities and/or new neuropsychiatric manifestations. We examined demographics, comorbidities, functional status, and presentation including neuropsychiatric symptoms and disorders, as well as paraclinical data. Cox survival analysis was conducted to determine risk factors for mortality at 40 days after the first symptoms of COVID-19. RESULTS: Out of 191 patients included (median age 80 [interquartile range 74-87]), 135 (71%) had neuropsychiatric comorbidities including cognitive impairment (39%), cerebrovascular disease (22%), Parkinsonism (6%), and brain tumors (6%). A total of 152 (79%) patients presented new-onset neuropsychiatric manifestations including sensory symptoms (6%), motor deficit (11%), behavioral (18%) and cognitive (23%) disturbances, gait impairment (11%), and impaired consciousness (18%). The mortality rate at 40 days was 19.4%. A history of brain tumor or Parkinsonism or the occurrence of impaired consciousness were neurological factors associated with a higher risk of mortality. A lower Activities of Daily Living score (hazard ratio [HR] 0.69, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.58-0.82), a neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio ≥ 9.9 (HR 5.69, 95% CI 2.69-12.0), and thrombocytopenia (HR 5.70, 95% CI 2.75-11.8) independently increased the risk of mortality (all p < .001). CONCLUSION: Understanding mortality risk factors in older inpatients with COVID-19 and neuropsychiatric conditions may be helpful to neurologists and geriatricians who manage these patients in clinical practice.

2.
Médecine du Sommeil ; 19(1):44, 2022.
Article in French | ScienceDirect | ID: covidwho-1698857

ABSTRACT

Objectif Évaluer l’impact des restrictions liées au COVID-19 sur la narcolepsie de type 1 (NT1), la narcolepsie de type 2 (NT2) et l’hypersomnie idiopathique (HI). Méthodes Enquête en ligne évaluant les caractéristiques clinico-démographiques et professionnelles pendant le premier confinement a été proposée aux patients ayant une NT1, NT2 et HI, suivis dans un hôpital universitaire. Résultats Les 219 personnes ayant répondu à l’enquête ont signalé une augmentation moyenne de 1,2±1,9h (p<0,001) du temps de sommeil nocturne et une diminution moyenne de 1,0±3,4 points (p<0,001) sur l’échelle de somnolence d’Epworth. Les télétravailleurs ont eu une augmentation moyenne de 0,9±1,2h de leur sommeil nocturne (p<0,001) et une diminution moyenne du score de somnolence de 1,6±3,1 (p<0,001). La cataplexie s’est améliorée chez 54,1 % des NT1. La somnolence est corrélée au bien-être psychologique (R=0,3, p<0,001). 42,5 % des patients ont apprécié ce premier confinement, grâce à la réaffectation du temps habituellement consacré aux trajets domicile-travail, à un temps de sommeil plus long, aux loisirs et à la famille, et ont apprécié un horaire de sieste plus libre. À l’inverse, 13,2 % des patients ont ressenti un sentiment d’isolement et de détresse psychologique. Conclusion Ces résultats suggèrent que les personnes atteintes d’HI, NT1 et NT2 peuvent bénéficier d’une diminution des contraintes sociales et professionnelles sur les habitudes de sommeil et soulignent l’importance des aménagements des horaires et du lieu de travail dans cette population.

3.
J Glob Antimicrob Resist ; 28: 18-29, 2022 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1559309

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Uncomplicated urinary tract infections (uUTIs) are a common problem in female patients. Management is mainly based on empirical prescribing, but there are concerns about overtreatment and antimicrobial resistance (AMR), especially in patients with recurrent uUTIs. METHODS: A multidisciplinary panel of experts met to discuss diagnosis, treatment, prevention, guidelines, AMR, clinical trial design and the impact of COVID-19 on clinical practice. RESULTS: Symptoms remain the cornerstone of uUTI diagnosis, and urine culture is necessary only when empirical treatment fails or rapid recurrence of symptoms or AMR is suspected. Specific antimicrobials are first-line therapy (typically nitrofurantoin, fosfomycin, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and pivmecillinam, dependent on availability and local resistance data). Fluoroquinolones are not first-line options for uUTIs primarily due to safety concerns but also rising resistance rates. High-quality data to support most non-antimicrobial approaches are lacking. Local AMR data specific to community-acquired uUTIs are needed, but representative information is difficult to obtain; instead, identification of risk factors for AMR can provide a basis to guide empirical antimicrobial prescribing. The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted the management of uUTIs in some countries and may have long-lasting implications for future models of care. CONCLUSION: Management of uUTIs in female patients can be improved without increasing complexity, including simplified diagnosis and empirical antimicrobial prescribing based on patient characteristics, including a review of recent antimicrobial use and past pathogen resistance profiles, drug availability and guidelines. Current data for non-antimicrobial approaches are limited. The influence of COVID-19 on telehealth could provide an opportunity to enhance patient care in the long term.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Drug Treatment , Urinary Tract Infections , Consensus , Female , Humans , Pandemics , Patient Care , Urinary Tract Infections/diagnosis , Urinary Tract Infections/drug therapy
4.
Brain Commun ; 3(3): fcab135, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1360337

ABSTRACT

A variety of neuropsychiatric complications has been described in association with COVID-19 infection. Large scale studies presenting a wider picture of these complications and their relative frequency are lacking. The objective of our study was to describe the spectrum of neurological and psychiatric complications in patients with COVID-19 seen in a multidisciplinary hospital centre over 6 months. We conducted a retrospective, observational study of all patients showing neurological or psychiatric symptoms in the context of COVID-19 seen in the medical and university neuroscience department of Assistance Publique Hopitaux de Paris-Sorbonne University. We collected demographic data, comorbidities, symptoms and severity of COVID-19 infection, neurological and psychiatric symptoms, neurological and psychiatric examination data and, when available, results from CSF analysis, MRI, EEG and EMG. A total of 249 COVID-19 patients with a de novo neurological or psychiatric manifestation were included in the database and 245 were included in the final analyses. One-hundred fourteen patients (47%) were admitted to the intensive care unit and 10 (4%) died. The most frequent neuropsychiatric complications diagnosed were encephalopathy (43%), critical illness polyneuropathy and myopathy (26%), isolated psychiatric disturbance (18%) and cerebrovascular disorders (16%). No patients showed CSF evidence of SARS-CoV-2. Encephalopathy was associated with older age and higher risk of death. Critical illness neuromyopathy was associated with an extended stay in the intensive care unit. The majority of these neuropsychiatric complications could be imputed to critical illness, intensive care and systemic inflammation, which contrasts with the paucity of more direct SARS-CoV-2-related complications or post-infection disorders.

5.
J Clin Sleep Med ; 18(1): 255-263, 2022 01 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1328231

ABSTRACT

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To assess the impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-related restrictions on narcolepsy type 1 (NT2), narcolepsy type 2 (NT2), and idiopathic hypersomnia (IH). METHODS: Participants with NT1, NT2, and IH followed in a university hospital completed an online 78-question survey assessing demographic, clinical, and occupational features of the population during the first COVID-19-related lockdown. RESULTS: A total of 219 of 851 (25.7%) respondents of the survey reported a mean increase of 1.2 ± 1.9 hours (P < .001) in night sleep time and a mean decrease of 1.0 ± 3.4 points (P < .001) on the Epworth Sleepiness Scale during lockdown. Bedtime was delayed by 46.1% of participants and wakeup time was delayed by 59.6%, driven primarily by participants with IH. Teleworkers (but not in-person workers) reported a mean increase of 0.9 ± 1.2 hours in night sleep (P < .001) and a mean decrease in sleepiness score of 1.6 ± 3.1 (P < .001). Cataplexy improved in 54.1% of participants with NT1. Sleepiness correlated with psychological wellness (r = .3, P < .001). As many as 42.5% enjoyed the lockdown, thanks to reallocation of time usually spent commuting toward longer sleep time, hobbies, and family time, and appreciated a freer napping schedule. Conversely, 13.2% disliked the lockdown, feeling isolation and psychological distress. CONCLUSIONS: Extended sleep time, circadian delay (in patients with IH), and teleworking resulted in decreased symptoms of central hypersomnias. These findings suggest that people with IH, NT1, and NT2 may benefit from a decrease in social and professional constraints on sleep-wake habits, and support advocacy efforts aimed at facilitating workplace and schedule accommodations for this population. CITATION: Nigam M, Hippolyte A, Dodet P, et al. Sleeping through a pandemic: impact of COVID-19-related restrictions on narcolepsy and idiopathic hypersomnia. J Clin Sleep Med. 2022;18(1):255-263.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Disorders of Excessive Somnolence , Idiopathic Hypersomnia , Narcolepsy , Communicable Disease Control , Disorders of Excessive Somnolence/epidemiology , Humans , Idiopathic Hypersomnia/complications , Idiopathic Hypersomnia/drug therapy , Idiopathic Hypersomnia/epidemiology , Narcolepsy/drug therapy , Narcolepsy/epidemiology , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2 , Sleep
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL